• attacks, sieges, starvation tactics, and sexual violence, as a necessary precondition for any humanitarian intervention and political dialogue
  
  Recall that, under the Genocide Convention and international customary law, all States have an obligation to prevent and punish genocide wherever there is a serious risk of its commission

• arms, ammunition, drones and equipment to the RSF, SAF or affiliated armed groups
  
  Call on all EU Member States, in line with the Arms Trade Treaty and the EU Common Position on arms exports, to immediately suspend the authorisation of arms transfers to States credibly alleged to be supplying arms to parties to the conflict in Sudan, including the UAE and other regional actors, where there is a clear risk that such arms could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian or human rights law

degradation, and gold mining controlled by armed groups—are exacerbating the conflict. The interference of foreign actors and geopolitical interests, such as the provision of military equipment to the fighting parties, in particular the support of the UAE to the RSF, has prolonged the fighting and aggravated its consequences.

During and after the 2019 Sudanese Revolution, various civil actors have cooperated in order to push towards a democratically elected civil government. Their efforts were set back by a military coup in 2021 led by the current leaders of the SAF and the RSF.

degradation, and gold mining controlled by armed groups—are exacerbating the conflict and entrenching violence as communities compete over increasingly scarce resources..

• Reject the establishment of a parallel governing authority in areas controlled by the RSF.

• • Sanction all individuals and entities responsible for arms transfers, financing, or enabling atrocities, including those operating through shell companies, gold supply chains, and foreign mercenary networks.

• • Apply targeted asset freezes and travel bans to RSF and SAF leadership implicated in war crimes and ensure these sanctions are harmonised across EU Member States.

• • Expand resettlement programmes, ensure access to asylum, end forced returns, and investigate abuses committed by border authorities, including racial profiling and violent pushbacks. Ensure that Sudanese refugees have access to fair asylum procedures and protection within the EU, and prohibit the externalisation of asylum processing to unsafe third countries.

• • bring together regional and international actors to restore a coherent mediation framework aligned wtih African-led peace efforts.

• • recognise Recognise environmental degradation as a driver and consequence of conflict, and integrate climate justice into all humanitarian and peace-building strategies.

• • Ensure EU mandatory due diligence legislation covering raw materials from Sudan to interrupt supply chains linked to RSF financing, including gold, gum arabic, and agricultural exports. Sanctions must also target transnational gold traders, private military contractors, and mercentary networks profiting from Sudan's conflict economy.

• • Ensure accountability for corporations contributing to environmental destruction or benefiting from conflict-related exploitation.

• • Work towards and finance climate adaptation initiatives for displacement-affected regions with community-led design and implementation.

• Publicly acknowledge the role of European-produced components, dual-use technologies, and surveillance equipment in enabling armed actors in Sudan, and call for comprehensive end-use monitoring and export restrictions.

• Promote political dialogue that is inclusive of survivors, women, youth, and marginalised groups.

• Ensure the establishment of a peace process that includes fact-finding missions, truth commissions, redress for victims, and psychosocial support for survivors, especially for those of sexual and gender-based violence.

• Support independent investigations into all alleged abuses and violations by all parties to the conflict, and the use of criminal justice processes, including those at the International Criminal Court, to ensure perpetrators of international crimes and breaches of international law are held accountable.

• Call for urgent, unrestricted, and safe humanitarian access through all possible routes

• Call for an immediate, nationwide ceasefire and an end to indiscriminate attacks, sieges, starvation tactics, and sexual violence, as a necessary precondition for any humanitarian intervention and political dialoguepermanent cessation of all hostilities, including an end to indiscriminate attacks, sieges, starvation tactics, and sexual violence, the establishment of an independent monitoring mechanism of the ceasefire, the protection of all civilians and civilian objects, rapid and unhindered humanitarian access for civilians in need, including cross-border operations where needed, without political or military interference, and full compliance with human rights and applicable obligations under international law.

• Call for strict implementation offull adherence to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1556 (2004) of 30 July 2004, Resolution 2736 (2024) of 13 June 2024, and Resolution 2791 (2025), implementation of the Jeddah Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civlians of Sudan, and expansion of the Darfur arms embargo to all Sudan to prevent the flow of weaposn to all warring parties.

degradation, and gold mining controlled by armed groups—are exacerbating the conflict and entrenching violence as communities compete over increasingly scarce resources.

stigma, starvation as a method of warfare, widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure, and obstruction of humanitarian aid. These violations, which reflect a deliberate strategy to terrorise populations and dismantle community structures, collectively meet the legal threshold for genocide under the Rome Statute and the Genocide Convention.

Sudan is now the world's gravest crisis of forced displacement and hunger. Since April 2023, the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has escalated into oneresulted in hundreds of the world’s biggest humanitarian crises, with thousands murdered and, over 13 million displaced. Twenty-five, 17 million people faceout of school, 25 million facing severe hungerfood insecurity, and the complete collapse of state structures. The RSF’s assault on El Fasher on 26 October 2025 resulted in mass

facilities and the killing of hundreds of patients inside the city’s maternity hospital. Many of those who attempted to flee El Fasher were exploited, tortured, or executed. Those who managed to escape to humanitarian reception centres arrived severely malnourished, preilously ill, and traumatised after making the long journey on foot.

The genocide in Darfur is amongyielded one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes of the 21st century. Nearly two decades later, the region is again ensnared in armed conflict with warring parties committing war crimes, crimes against humanity and violations of international humanitarian law on a scale that demands an urgent global response.

Sudan. Civilians are facing brutal violence, displacement and the destruction of natural resourcesthe environment. We stand in solidarity with the civilian victims and call for immediate coordinated international action to stop the violence and address the crisis’s root causes, including decades of political marginalisation, militarisation, and foreign interference.

Training large AI models and expanding cloud infrastructures will further increase emissions unless strict energy efficiency standards are enforced and task specific models are encouraged over general models. A sovereign digital transition must also be a sustainable one, aligned with the Green Deal and the

3. Environmental and global impactGlobal Impact of Digital Technologies.

but about how the system itself operates, exploiting emotions, vulnerabilities, and even mental health for profit. A need of yet higher level of fines for actors more than once violating GDPR, AI Act, Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act to such a level that the fines cannot be factored in as a business risk.